This research is to investigate the augmentation of cooling performance of water-cooling in the electric vehicle secondary battery. The research focused on the numerical study of heat transfer coefficients for cooling performance augmentation. To improve the water-cooling performance with three different inlet sections of water-cooling and five different mass flow rates, air-cooling, and water-cooling were compared. To compare the water-cooling performance, selected local positions for various temperature distributions were marked on the battery cell surface. The normalized local Nusselt number of the cooling area at the normalized height position indicated that the heat transfer coefficient of the combined section was averaging at 77.95 and 58.33% higher than that of the circle and square, respectively. The heat transfer coefficient with the normalized width by water-cooling at combined section was averaging at 5.15 times higher than that of the air-cooling. At the normalized height, the cooling performance at the water flow rates of 10 Lpm was averaging at 68-74% higher than that of 5 Lpm and 35-39% lower than that of 25 Lpm. Ultimately, the best cooling performance existed with the combined section, and the water flow rate of 10 Lpm was most appropriate, given the temperature difference and power consumption.

This study is to investigate the cooling performance of the secondary battery in electric vehicles according to three different gaps between battery cells. To accomplish the convective cooling performance of the battery surface with three different gaps, selected local positions (X, Y, Z) for various temperature distributions were marked on the gap surface contacting the cell surface. The cooling performance of the gap of 0.5 mm was compared with the gaps of 5 mm, and 1 mm. Normalized local Nusselt number of the cooling area at the normalized width position indicated that the gap of 0.5 mm was on average 26.99% lower than that of 5 mm and 0.49% lower than that of 1 mm. At the normalized height, the gap of 0.5 mm was on average 12.12% higher than that of 1 mm. Because of the vortex at the outlet area, cooling performance at the gap of 0.5 mm was on average 13.19% higher than that of 5 mm and 0.79% higher than that of 1 mm at normalized thickness. Ultimately, the best cooling performance existed at the gap of 5 mm, but the gap of 0.5 mm was best for improving space efficiency, energy storage capacity, and vehicle-driving durability.