Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission

JKSPE : Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Article

Comparison of Strain on Dental Cervical Line between Tooth Fracture Test and Finite Element Analysis

Oui Sik Yoo, Keyoung Jin Chun
JKSPE 2010;27(4):87-94.
Published online: April 1, 2010
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev

When occlusal force is applied to a tooth, stress concentration occurs on the dental cervical line. This study investigated to find the maximum force and strain of natural teeth using an Instron and strain gauges, comparing the strain of cervical enamel using finite element analysis(FEA). Tests were conducted with a mandibular first premolar applying the conditions of occlusion. Then, the FEA was processed with the same as conditions of the fracture test. The test showed that the maximum force, maximum compressive strain and maximum tensional strain was 278±26 N, 0.668×10-3±0.678×10-3 and 0.248×10-3±0.102×10-3, respectively. It was found that six of eight measured strains were within the range of estimated strains by the FEA. Even though it was assumed that properties of FE models were isotropic, it could prove useful as a reference in understanding the tendency of dental strain.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Comparison of Strain on Dental Cervical Line between Tooth Fracture Test and Finite Element Analysis
J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng.. 2010;27(4):87-94.   Published online April 1, 2010
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Comparison of Strain on Dental Cervical Line between Tooth Fracture Test and Finite Element Analysis
J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng.. 2010;27(4):87-94.   Published online April 1, 2010
Close