Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • E-Submission

JKSPE : Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
SPECIAL

레이더 쉘터 내부 열원 배치 구조에 따른 온도 변화의 전산 유체 역학적 분석

Analysis of Temperature Variation by Structural Arrangement of Internal Heat Sources in Radar Shelters

Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019;36(2):115-119.
Published online: February 1, 2019

1 창원대학교 대학원 기계설계공학과

2 창원대학교 기계공학부

1 Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Graduate School, Changwon National University

2 School of Mechanical Engineering, Changwon National University

#E-mail: changwoo1220@iCloud.com, TEL: +82-55-213-3618
• Received: December 4, 2018   • Revised: January 2, 2019   • Accepted: January 9, 2019

Copyright © The Korean Society for Precision Engineering

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 4 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next
  • In modern society, industries are being upgraded in various fields. In particular, the defense industry has developed numerous technologies, such as the localization of core military technologies. The defense industry is actively studying technologies in areas such as in helicopters and tanks. In the case of radars, research on the radar itself is very active as is the research on the components that make up the radar. In this study, the temperature distribution of the two types of evacuation centers that make up the radar were analyzed using Computer Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to identify the temperature distribution based on the internal structure of the shelter. The two types of shelters have different heating values in different arrangements in the shelter provided they have the same size of heat source. Simulation results showed that the average temperature at the KA LNA shelter was different. In this study, we analyzed the effects of internal structure on the temperature and confirmed that the internal temperature may be decreased by changing the structure without using an external cooling element.
In modern societies, the industry is being upgraded in various fields. With the Fourth Industrial Revolution,1 safety diagnosis based on artificial intelligence is being carried out and various coating methods are being studied for production technology and development of flexible applications for flexible display in the field of machine tools.2-5 In particular, the defense industry has developed many technologies, such as domestication of core military technology, and the defense industry is actively researching fields such as helicopter and tram. In the case of detection equipment such as radar, precise detection capability of guided weapons used in the early battlefield is required. Numerous researches have been conducted to improve the accuracy of radar, and studies on parts constituting radar other than radar itself have been actively carried out. R. Kim designed three types of low-power cross-coupled voltage controlled generators for short range radar based on the CMOS process,6 G. Choi designed of 77 GHz radar transmitter using 13 GHz CMOS frequency synthesizer and multiplier,7 S. Jung designed and manufactured of CMOS SOC-based transceiver for an automotive radar on 77 GHZ8 and J. Lee designed and fabricated power amplifiers for an active array phase radar system with an S bandwidth of 400 MHz.9 G. Moon has also been attempting to improve radar performance using various techniques, such as applying a nonlinear Kalman filter to improve radar performance.10 In the case of radar, various environmental factors such as wind, weather, and temperature due to external installation should be considered. Regarding temperature, finite element analysis has actively been applied in related research for a long time. It is difficult to attach sensors for temperature measurement because of the high temperature or process conditions. H.W. Park performed temperature prediction through the finite element analysis of temperature distribution in the electron beam polishing process,11 and J.T. Kim estimated temperature distribution inside a solar cell module using a finite element analysis program12 and made predictions through finite element analysis in various fields.
In this study, the temperature distribution of two types of shelters constituting radar is analyzed through CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) and the temperature distribution according to the inner structure of the shelter is confirmed. The Two types of shelter were designed to be applied to current radar.
2.1 Simulation Boundary Conditions
Temperature distribution models for five shelters were designed with a scale of 1:1 using ANSYS 13.0 Fluent to analyze the effects of the position and convection type of heat sources. Fig. 1 shows the designs of the five shelters and their computational domains: (a) KA LNA shelter, (b) KA LNA shelter with air conditioner in hub (c) X LNA shelter (d) X LNA shelter with air conditioner in hub. Table 1 shows features of the simulated designs. This information was based on information provided by ANSYS workbench and FLUENT.
Fig. 1

Design of the two types shelters and computational domains thereof: (a, c) KA LNA shelter, (b, d) X LNA shelter

KSPE_2019_v36n2_115_f001.jpg
Table 1

Heat source & air material properties

Table 1
Properties Unit Fluid Shelter
material
Air Al
Density Kg/m3 0.83 2,700
Specific heat J/(g*oC) 1.013 0.9
Thermal conductivity
coefficient
W/(m*oC) 0.034 -
Thermal expansion
coefficient
m/(m*oC) 2.43*10-6 -
Viscosity N*s/m2 2.38*10-5 -
Heat transfer coefficient W/(m*oC) - -228
In KA LNA (a-b) and X LNA shelters (c-d), three heat sources were installed at the center of the shelters. Air heated by the heat sources circulates through natural convection, and heat exchange occurs through the two vents shown in Figs. 1(a) - (d), and surfaces of the cover of each shelter. Air velocity was set to 0.10 m/s considering the range of natural convection (< 0.30 m/s). Figs. 1(b) and (d) show the structure of the KA LNA shelter and the X LNA shelter including the external hub and air conditioner, respectively.13
(1)
Th=Ta+T=Ta+HMS
where Th, Ta are the temperature of each heat source and ambient temperature, respectively; ΔT is variation of temperature; H is heat flux of the heat source; M and S are the mass and specific heat of the heat source, respectively.
The heated air enters the air path and is cooled in the air conditioner. The cooled air is emitted into the shelter and decreases the temperature of air in the shelter. Heat exchange occurs between the air emitted from the air conditioner and circulated in the shelter, and through the vent and surfaces of the cover of the shelter. Table 2 shows the boundary conditions according to the designed shelters. Air velocities at the inlet and outlet of the air conditioner were set considering the air volumes and cross sectional areas at the inlet (800 m3/h) and outlet (370 m3/h). The temperature of cooled air was set considering the set temperature of the air conditioner. The temperatures of heat sources were derived using Eq. 1. The temperatures derived according to the shelter types are listed in Table 4.
Table 2

Boundary condition for heat analysis

Table 2
Properties Value[Units]
Shelter inlet velocity 0.1 [m/s]
External temperature 30 [oC]
Heat source temperature 30 [oC]
Table 3

Simulation results of KA LNA shelter

Table 3
Properties Value
Temperature range [oC] 30 - 33.5
Minimum temperature position Area adjacent to vent A
Average temperature [oC] 32
Maximum temperature position Area adjacent heat source
Air velocity rage [m/s] 0.01 - 0.21
Minimum air velocity position Area adjacent shelter wall
Average air velocity [m/s] 0.11
Maximum air velocity position Area adjacent to vent B
Table 4

Simulation results of X LNA shelter

Table 4
Properties Value
Temperature range [oC] 30 - 34.6
Minimum temperature position Area adjacent to vent A
Average temperature [oC] 33
Maximum temperature position Area adjacent heat source
Air velocity rage [m/s] 0.01 - 0.23
Minimum air velocity position Area adjacent shelter wall
Average air velocity [m/s] 0.12
Maximum air velocity position Area adjacent to vent B
The outlet velocities of the air conditioner inside the KA LNA shelter and the X LNA shelter hub were selected based on the velocity of the air conditioner (= 6 m/s) used in general. In the Ka RF shelter, air velocities at the inlet and outlet of the condenser were set to 8.54 m/s and 3.40 m/s, respectively, considering the air volumes and cross sectional areas at the inlet (800 m3/h) and outlet (370 m3/h). The temperature of the heat sources was calculated using Eq. 1.
The flow fields in the computational domains of the five shelters were discretized by ANSYS 13.0. All wall elements were discretized with hex mesh elements to increase convergence and the accuracy of simulation results. The numbers of mesh elements in the KA LNA, X LNA, and RF shelters were 60482, 59763, and 207683, respectively.
The k-ε model and standard wall function were used to model the turbulence field, for which the governing equations are defined as Eqs. (2) - (4).
(2)
ρkt+ρkuixi=xjμtσkkxj+2μtEijEij-ρε
(3)
ρεt+ρεuixi=xiμtεεxj+C1εεk2μtEijEij-C2εε2k
(4)
ε=Cμ3/4kP3/2kyP
where ρ is density of air; k is turbulent kinetic energy; ui is velocity component in the corresponding direction; Eij is the component of rate of deformation; ε is dissipation; μt is eddy viscosity; σk, σε, C1ε, and C2ε are adjustable constants that can be derived by numerical iterations of data fitting for a wide range of turbulent flows; kp is turbulent kinetic energy at a point P; yP is the distance from point P to a wall.
3.1 Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Temperature Distribution in Shelters KA LNA Shelter
Fig. 2 shows (a) the temperature distribution and (b) air flow in the shelter, and (c-d) cross sectional contour plots in the heat sources. The temperature in the shelter ranged from 30oC (adjacent to vent A) to 33.5oC (adjacent to heat source), with an average of approximately 32oC. The temperature decreased with proximity to the two air vents. Specifically, the temperature decrement of air in vent A is larger than in vent B although air velocity was higher in vent B than vent A. This could be attributed to the small difference of air velocity between vents A and B, and the larger cross sectional area of vent A than vent B; heat exchange between the ambient air and the air in the shelter takes place at the cross sectional area by convection. Moreover, vent A is located much father from the heat sources than vent B.
Fig. 2

(a) Temperature distribution in the KA LNA shelter; (b) air flow in the KA LNA shelter; (c, d) cross sectional contour plot in the heat source

KSPE_2019_v36n2_115_f002.jpg
3.2 Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Temperature Distribution in Shelters X LNA Shelter
Fig. 3 shows the results of the temperature distribution simulation of the shelter. In the figure, a represents the temperature distribution inside the shelter and b represents the flow rate of the air circulating inside; c and d represent the temperature distribution of the internal cross-section. Table 4 summarizes the simulation results. The temperature inside the shelter ranged from 30oC to 34.6oC, with an average of approximately 33oC. The reason for the internal temperature of the X LNA shelter being higher than that of the KA LNA shelter is related to the placement of the heat source. In the case of the X LNA shelter, unlike the KA LNA shelter, the cooling efficiency due to natural convection drops because the number of heat sources in the vicinity of vent B is smaller.
Fig. 3

(a) Temperature distribution in the KA LNA shelter; (b) air flow in the KA LNA shelter; (c, d) cross sectional contour plot in the heat source

KSPE_2019_v36n2_115_f003.jpg
In this study, the internal temperature distribution of two types of shelters containing radar was confirmed using heat sources. The shelter exhibited different temperature distributions according to the internal structure, and different internal temperatures according to the structure.
(1) In case of radar, because it is installed outdoors rather than indoors, it is highly affected by the environment. In particular, frequent faults occur due to increases in the temperature of components.
(2) The heat source of the KA LNA shelter and the X M LNA shelter constituting the radar was analyzed and the internal temperature distribution was confirmed.
(3) The mean temperature of the KA LNA shelter was 32oC, and the average temperature of the XM LNA shelter was 33oC. These differences were found to be due to differences in the arrangement of internal heat sources.
(4) Through this study, the effect of internal structure on the temperature was analyzed. Furthermore, it was verified that the temperature could be reduced through structural changes without external cooling factors.

Th

Heat source temperature

Ta

Ambient temperature

ΔT

Temperature variation

H

Heat flux

M

Mass

S

Specific heat

ρ

density

k

Turbulent kinetic energy

ui

Velocity component

Eij

Component of rate of deformation

μt

Eddy viscosity

yP

Distance from point P to wall
  • 1.
    Park, B. and Lee, C., “A Development on the Fault Prognosis of Bearing with Empirical Mode Decomposition and Artificial Neural Network,” Korean Society of Precision Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 12, pp. 985-992, 2016.
    10.7736/KSPE.2016.33.12.985
  • 2.
    Park, J., Kim, D., and Lee, C., “Contact Angle Control of Sessile Drops on a Tensioned Web,” Applied Surface Science, Vol. 437, No. 4, pp. 329-335, 2018.
    10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.152
  • 3.
    Park, J., Kim, S., and Lee, C., “An Analysis of Pinned Edge Layer of Slot-Die Coated Film in Roll-to-Roll Green Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 247-254, 2018.
    10.1007/s40684-018-0025-6
  • 4.
    Lee, C., “Stresses and Defects in Roll Products: A Review of Stress Models and Control Techniques,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 781-789, 2018.
    10.1007/s12541-018-0094-z
  • 5.
    Lee, J. and Lee, C., “Improvement of a Splicing Machine To Decrease Abrupt Tension Changes and Tail Defects During the Roll Exchange Process in a Roll-to-Roll Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 1155-1161, 2018.
    10.1007/s12541-018-0136-6
  • 6.
    Kim, R.-Y. and Kim, D.-W., “Design and Fabrication of CMOS Low-Power Cross-Coupled Voltage Controlled Oscillators for a Short Range Radar,” The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 591-600, 2010.
    10.5515/KJKIEES.2010.21.6.591
  • 7.
    Song, U.-J., Kang, H.-S., Choi, K.-J., Cui, C., Kim, S.-K., et al., “Design of 77 GHZ Radar Transmitter Using 13 GHZ CMOS Frequency Synthesizer and Multiplier,” The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, Vol. 23, No. 11, pp. 1297-1306, 2012.
    10.5515/KJKIEES.2012.23.11.1297
  • 8.
    Jeon, I.-S. and Chung, S.-T., “A Design and Manufacture of CMOS SoC-based Transceiver for an Automotive Radar on 77GHz,” Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, Vol. 13, No. 9, pp. 23-32, 2015.
    10.14801/jkiit.2015.13.9.23
  • 9.
    Lee, J.-W., Lim, J.-H., Kang, M.-I., Han, J.-S., Kim, J.-P., et al., “Design and Fabrication of S-Band GaN SSPA for a Radar,” The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, Vol. 22, No. 12, pp. 1139-1147, 2011.
    10.5515/KJKIEES.2011.22.12.1139
  • 10.
    Moon, G. H., Park, J. W., Jang, D. S., Tak, M. J., and No, J. E., “The Selection and Efficiency Improving of Nonlinear Kalman Filter for Radar Tracking Problem,” The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, No. 4, pp. 504-509, 2013.
  • 11.
    Kim, J., Kang, E., Lee, S., and Park, H., “Finite Element Analysis of Large-Electron-Beam Polishing-Induced Temperature Distribution,” Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 931-936, 2013.
    10.7735/ksmte.2013.22.6.931
  • 12.
    Park, Y.-E., Jung, T.-H., Go, S.-H., Ju, Y.-C., Kim, J.-T., et al., “Prediction of Temperature Distribution in PV Module using Finite Element Method,” Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 65-72, 2016.
    10.7836/kses.2016.36.2.065
  • 13.
    Barakos, G., Mitsoulis, E., and Assimacopoulos, D., “Natural Convection Flow in a Square Cavity Revisited: Laminar and Turbulent Models with Wall Functions,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 695-719, 1994.
    10.1002/fld.1650180705
Seongyong Kim
KSPE_2019_v36n2_115_bf001.jpg
received the B.Eng. and M.Eng. degrees from the Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon, Korea, in 2014, 2016, respectively, where he is currently working toward the Ph.D degree with the Department of Mechanical Design Engineering.
He has studied the radial stress distribution of winding system, computational fluid dynamics of slot-die coating process and analysis of strain in lamination process. His research interest includes printed electronic, CFD and FEM analysis roll-to-roll process including slot-die coating.
Changwoo Lee
KSPE_2019_v36n2_115_bf002.jpg
received the B.Eng., M.Eng., and Ph.D. degrees from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea, in 2001, 2003, and 2008, respectively. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Changwon National University, Changwon, Korea. His research interests include the areas of prognostic system for smart factory, web handling systems, fault-tolerant control, roll-to-roll printing and coating system, and finite-element analysis of behavior of flexible films in large-scale systems. He is the holder of several patents related to continuous roll-to-roll systems.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Analysis of Temperature Variation by Structural Arrangement of Internal Heat Sources in Radar Shelters
J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng.. 2019;36(2):115-119.   Published online February 1, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Analysis of Temperature Variation by Structural Arrangement of Internal Heat Sources in Radar Shelters
J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng.. 2019;36(2):115-119.   Published online February 1, 2019
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
Analysis of Temperature Variation by Structural Arrangement of Internal Heat Sources in Radar Shelters
Image Image Image
Fig. 1 Design of the two types shelters and computational domains thereof: (a, c) KA LNA shelter, (b, d) X LNA shelter
Fig. 2 (a) Temperature distribution in the KA LNA shelter; (b) air flow in the KA LNA shelter; (c, d) cross sectional contour plot in the heat source
Fig. 3 (a) Temperature distribution in the KA LNA shelter; (b) air flow in the KA LNA shelter; (c, d) cross sectional contour plot in the heat source
Analysis of Temperature Variation by Structural Arrangement of Internal Heat Sources in Radar Shelters

Heat source & air material properties

Properties Unit Fluid Shelter
material
Air Al
Density Kg/m3 0.83 2,700
Specific heat J/(g*oC) 1.013 0.9
Thermal conductivity
coefficient
W/(m*oC) 0.034 -
Thermal expansion
coefficient
m/(m*oC) 2.43*10-6 -
Viscosity N*s/m2 2.38*10-5 -
Heat transfer coefficient W/(m*oC) - -228

Boundary condition for heat analysis

Properties Value[Units]
Shelter inlet velocity 0.1 [m/s]
External temperature 30 [oC]
Heat source temperature 30 [oC]

Simulation results of KA LNA shelter

Properties Value
Temperature range [oC] 30 - 33.5
Minimum temperature position Area adjacent to vent A
Average temperature [oC] 32
Maximum temperature position Area adjacent heat source
Air velocity rage [m/s] 0.01 - 0.21
Minimum air velocity position Area adjacent shelter wall
Average air velocity [m/s] 0.11
Maximum air velocity position Area adjacent to vent B

Simulation results of X LNA shelter

Properties Value
Temperature range [oC] 30 - 34.6
Minimum temperature position Area adjacent to vent A
Average temperature [oC] 33
Maximum temperature position Area adjacent heat source
Air velocity rage [m/s] 0.01 - 0.23
Minimum air velocity position Area adjacent shelter wall
Average air velocity [m/s] 0.12
Maximum air velocity position Area adjacent to vent B
Table 1 Heat source & air material properties
Table 2 Boundary condition for heat analysis
Table 3 Simulation results of KA LNA shelter
Table 4 Simulation results of X LNA shelter